by Abbie Goodman, MALSCE Chief of External Affairs
We are tracking issues related reporting for design professionals to Workforce Participation Goal Requirements under M.G.L. c. 149, § 44A(2)(G), which states that all contracts by a state agency or state-assisted contracts for design, construction, reconstruction, installation, demolition, maintenance, or repair must contain workforce participation goals for minorities and women.
Let Abbie Goodman know if you are seeing language related to this reporting in your contracts.
7.20.4. Minority and Women Workforce Participation and Reporting. If the Awarding Authority is a state agency then pursuant to M.G.L. c. 7C, s. 6 and M.G.L. c. 149, s. 44A(1)(G) the Designer shall make every effort with a goal of increasing opportunities for minority and women design professionals to provide services under this contract. The Designer shall provide monthly reports of the gender and race/ethnicity of employees engaged in work under this contract in the form and format required by DCAMM, including, but not limited to electronic reporting.
Next Board of Registration meeting: May 26, 2022, on Teams. The Board of Registration plans to continue virtual meetings for now, as the Governor and Legislature have extended the law allowing virtual public meetings like this to continue through July 15, 2022. To connect to the meeting, go to this page and scroll down to the meeting listing to download the agenda with connection instructions.
As of 12/21/21, the PE and PLS Board does not have an Executive Director so Esther Laine, Deputy Commissioner of Boards, is filling in until the position is filled.
April 28, 2022, Meeting Summary: these are not minutes, but a summary of what I heard.
Chair Paul Tyrell opened the meeting at 9:05 AM
March 24, 2022, Meeting Summary: these are not minutes, but a summary of what I heard.
Noted at beginning of report: As of 4/4/22, the FAQ section of the Division of Occupational Licensure/Board of Registration of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors website is now updated to reflect the new answer the Board approved at its March Board meeting:
Previously reported Background on Town of Swansea Issue (scroll down in November MALSCE Report)
- The public meeting ended at 10:30 AM
5/6/22 House Reporting date extended to May 23, 2022. On May 16, I learned that the House Transportation Committee planned to include our Dig Safe language in the Infrastructure Bond bill. We’ve be advocating for this aggressively! See attached: Committee Report and Summary. Bill is expected to be posted with new number by May 23.
H.3297, An Act supporting safe excavation practices https://malegislature.gov/Bills/192/H3297 has been enacted in the House.
From State House News Service:
Chris Lisinski, State House News Service, 5/16/22 4:43 PM
STATE HOUSE, BOSTON, MAY 16, 2022.....The $9.75 billion infrastructure bond bill that cleared the Transportation Committee does not include any language creating a new rail authority to oversee a passenger train extension to western Massachusetts, bucking a prediction Congressman Richard Neal made last month when he and state officials announced a historic agreement to advance the project.
Lawmakers on the panel packed $47 million in additional spending on top of the bottom line in the bill Gov. Charlie Baker filed (H 4561), calling for increased investments in regional transit authorities and $25 million in grants aimed at reducing roadway congestion by promoting carpooling and running shuttles.
But neither the text of the redraft nor a bullet-point summary a committee aide produced make any reference to East-West Rail or launching a new authority.
In April, Neal and Gov. Charlie Baker announced they had agreed on a path forward to extend passenger rail from Worcester -- the current western terminus for the MBTA's commuter rail network -- to Springfield and Pittsfield. Neal said the plans hinged on standing up a new rail authority in the pending infrastructure bond bill as well as seeking a dedicated funding stream tied to the federal infrastructure law steering billions to Massachusetts.
Lawmakers could tack on language creating the authority during the bill's journey through the House and Senate.
The Boston-based MBTA current oversees the core bus and subway systems as well as a commuter rail network that runs north, south and west of the city.
The panel's version of Baker's infrastructure bond bill also includes language that would require the MBTA to provide "adequate parking alternatives" for commuters whenever the agency is demolishing or reconstructing a garage or lot it controls. It additionally pursues reforms to the state's "Dig Safe" laws that would "ensure all underground utilities are properly accounted for at all relevant stages of a project that will require excavation," according to the committee's summary.
Otherwise, the legislation that cleared its first committee hurdle mostly aligns with the measure Baker proposed in March to maximize the impact of a new federal infrastructure law.
The bottom line represents a combination of federal and state spending. According to the committee summary, the bill calls for using $3.5 billion to compete for federal grants as well as steering $2.8 billion to federal highway projects, $1.35 billion to state roads, bridges and routes, $1.38 billion to MBTA modernization, and $145 million to multi-modal projects and shared use paths.
Other areas of funding include $114 million for aeronautics safety and modernization, $200 million for state emissions reduction programs including expansion of electric vehicle charging infrastructure, $82 million for an industrial rail access program and $64.9 million for regional transit authorities.
Like Baker's bill, the committee redraft includes language giving the Department of Transportation authority to use flashing blue lights as a safety measure in work zones where law enforcement personnel are on site. It would also empower MassDOT to deploy "A+B bidding" that considers both project cost and the amount of time required.
Legislative leaders had not yet assigned the Transportation Committee's version of the bill a new number nor sent it forward to the next committee for review as of Monday afternoon.
"The way this works is the state authorizes, the state moves forward, the state spends, and the federal government reimburses," Baker said when he outlined his bill in March. "It's critical for us to get this legislation passed as quickly as we possibly can, which will then enable us to move forward aggressively putting this $9.7 billion series of projects to work throughout Massachusetts over the next five years."
Once it reaches the floor, lawmakers will likely push to pack additional spending and earmarks for their districts into the proposal.
A spokesperson for House Speaker Ronald Mariano said Monday that the infrastructure bill will not feature during formal sessions scheduled for Wednesday and Thursday.
Important: To be recognized as a MALSCE member you must login using your MALSCE assigned username and password.
Registration is processed through the MALSCE associated website, www.engineers.org. MALSCE is supported by the staff of The Engineering Center Education Trust.
Please note: Altering your name or contact information during registration may overwrite your record in our membership database and prevent you from receiving your member benefits.
If you have additional questions regarding registration, please contact us at 617/227-5551 or firstname.lastname@example.org.